Talk:Saint-Domingue expedition

Result needs updating
I think the result section really needs to be updated. The indemnity question was at the heart of 19th century Haiti and the article seems to deal with it in a matter-of-fact way, ignores President Boyer and really has not much to do with an article on the Saint-Domingue Expedition. I do not have time now, but one of you may want to check books like "The making of Haïti: the Saint Domingue revolution from below" by Carolyn E. Fick, it may be very useful for a more insightful conclusion here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.80.115.192 (talk) 04:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

What happened to the parlay
So apparently both Napoleon and Louverture wanted to talk things over. But nothing is written about this 78.68.210.173 (talk) 01:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll copy this questions to the French encyclopedia, maybe they can help 78.68.210.173 (talk) 11:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Why is the Swiss Confederation (1803-1815) listed as belligerent?
The infobox lists the Swiss Confederation as a belligerent, but the article doesn’t provide any details on its role in this conflict. While I found references to two Swiss officers (Gustav von der Ried, David-Philippe Treytorrens) who served in the French Army in Haiti, I could not find any information on how the Swiss Confederation was involved in this conflict. What’s the source for this claim? AcrophobicEagle (talk) 01:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)