Talk:Saint-Louis-du-Louvre/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 19:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

I'll take another look at it tomorrow! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

To get back to the issues raised in the first review:
 * Google books: this template should help. But I didn't really mean that, I meant the pages around here, where I often need to follow another link to get to what you point to (such as with Paul-Henri Marron in ref #10).
 * I still have a small problem with ref #11: The source says that the building was demolished in 1811 but that parts remained until 1850, being replaced with the Denon Wing. By clicking through some pages, I found that that is actually is a part of the Louvre Palace. Maybe you can clarify that in the prose, so that it matches better to the source?
 * You wikilinked Louvre Palace in the lead, but you should link it at the first mention in the content body as well.
 * The first paragraph of Saint-Louis-du-Louvre should not be without an inline citation.

Again, seven days to take care of the issues. Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I've made appropriate edits. Thanks for the tip on the Google Books template.  I haven't found a way to deal with the issue of the l'Oratoire du Louve pages.  I still want to use that reference because it provides some unique information.  I have added one non-web reference taken from the French Wikipedia page for Marron that is the source of some of that sentence.Djkeddie (talk) 23:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a pass now, congratulations :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I will however list it under Art and architecture, not World History. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, having another person look at an article is invaluable.Djkeddie (talk) 22:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)