Talk:Saint Lucia at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LauraHale (talk · contribs) 00:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Stating criteria for reference: A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Well written

 * Symbol confirmed.svg Lead summarises body. Nothing found in the lead is not found elsewhere, and cited in those locations. The prose is clear, concise and easy to read.  Made one or two minor fixes to add a bit more clarity. No spelling errors that I can see. --LauraHale (talk) 00:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Appears to match with the manual of style. Tables appear to be used appropriately and in compliance with the manual of style. --LauraHale (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Factually accurate and verifiable

 * Symbol confirmed.svg Obligatory plagiarism check:   No concerns.  Where phrases appear, the are names or events and cannot be modified with out changing the meaning.


 * Symbol confirmed.svg References are all properly formatted.  They are consistently formatted.  There are no broken links. --LauraHale (talk) 00:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Sources match the text and the information in the article is verifiable. --LauraHale (talk) 00:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Broad in its coverage

 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article appears broad in coverage.  Would be nice to know if there was any welcome home recognition for the athletes, but as none medaled, this may not be necessary.  It might also be nice to have additional information about television coverage and funding related to sending St Lucian athletes t the games. The article adequately covers the athletes who competed. Inclined to give this a pass, but if that information is available, it would be nice to included it, especially if the article may go further. --LauraHale (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I double-checked for sources (I even checked Newsbank) and I couldn't really find anything useful. I'm sure that there is something, but it most certainly is escaping my grasp at the moment. --Starstriker7(Talk) 03:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article appears neutral. The article does not give WP:UNDUE to any sections.  It does not appear to suggest bias in the quality of the country's performance at the games. --LauraHale (talk) 00:33, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Stable

 * Symbol confirmed.svg Article appears stable, with very few edits. --LauraHale (talk)

Illustrated, if possible, by images
Images appear to have the proper copyright. I removed the pictograms because they cannot be read by people with screenreaders. Please confirm that specific images have been looked for as they pertain to this nation and its athletes at the games, and that none were found. Once done, will give this section a pass. --LauraHale (talk) 00:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I took another look. I couldn't find anything on the Commons. Of all the Internet images I saw, I couldn't confirm the copyright statuses of the images that weren't listed as "All Rights Reserved". I could contact Saint Lucia's Olympic committee and try to gain OTRS permissions for images, but it is a lot of red tape in really unfamiliar territory; I'm not quite sure even where to start. --Starstriker7(Talk) 03:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Overall
A comment or two regarding scope, confirmation that no copyright usable images are available for the article, and we're good to rock and roll. :) --LauraHale (talk) 00:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. It was really thorough! :) Let me know if there is anything else. --Starstriker7(Talk) 03:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Good to go then. :) Will pass. --LauraHale (talk) 05:07, 27 November 2011 (UTC)