Talk:Saint Mary of the Assumption Catholic Church/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 17:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

In progress... look for review next week. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 17:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments follow:


 * Prose :
 * I'm not sure The church's name refers to the ancient Christian belief that the mother of Jesus Christ was "assumed body and soul into heavenly glory. makes sense to include, as it's not in the article body.
 * Article covers general aspects well enough for criteria.

-- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:00, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * References :
 * References need to be properly and fully formatted (authors, dates, access dates, titles, etc.) and should be archived, if possible.
 * Speaking of, current ref 4 is a dead link (404 on site).
 * Spot-checked statements cited to current refs 2, 6, 8, and 10. Didn't spot any issues with verification or close paraphrasing.
 * The direct quotation in the restoration section should be directly sourced, rather than requiring someone to click through three links.
 * I'm a bit concerned that there's such a heavy reliance on primary sources throughout for the history—if there's not secondary sources about this stuff it makes me feel less like the article is independently notable from the NRHP-designated locality.
 * Images :
 * The placement of images in the article right now makes the entire thing hard to read. I'd recommend making a gallery and move them out of the way of the prose.
 * Given that File:Saint Mary of the Assumption Church (Columbus, Ohio) - stained glass, Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, detail.jpg is a picture of a work stated to have been installed in 1932, I'm not sure you can assume it's public domain and free, especially since the US doesn't cover interiors in its freedom of panorama criterion. Since we don't have any authorship information we can't make a PD claim by the death of the creator. Unless you can dig up additional information it's likely a non-free image.
 * I see there's been some minor updates per this GAN... Nheyob are the other concerns going to be addressed in a timely manner? Otherwise I'll be closing this GAN. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 17:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * No, it'll take me some time. Thank you so much for your expertise and kind advice. Nheyob (talk) 13:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok. If you renominate it in the future and have addressed the above, you can give me a ping and I'll try to get it a more timely review. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 16:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)