Talk:Saint Paul, Minnesota/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Utahraptor Talk/Contribs 19:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article. My review will be posted in the next few hours. The Utahraptor Talk/Contribs 19:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

However, any commentary is welcome. The Utahraptor Talk/Contribs 21:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC) I have now completed the review. I am placing the article On Hold for two one week s to give editors time to fix the problems addressed below. The Utahraptor Talk/Contribs 21:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * 2. Factually accurate


 * References five, 21, 31, 54, 64, 73, 81, and 92 are deadlinks. This should be fixed.
 * There is one citation needed tag that needs to be addressed. Other than that the referencing looks good. The information in this article matches the sources well.


 * ✅ Bob Amnertiopsis ∴ChatMe! 04:36, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * This is just a reminder, if you fix/address the deadlinks and take care of the citation needed tag, I will pass this article. The Utahraptor Talk/Contribs 01:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Yup, still working on it... Bob Amnertiopsis ∴ChatMe! 03:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good now. I am passing this article. The Utahraptor Talk/Contribs 22:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)