Talk:Saint Vincenca

Requested move 26 June 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Rough consensus not to move. Andrewa (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Saint Vincenca → Vincenca – Saint is not included in the titles of articles about Christian saints where it is unnecessary for disambiguation, per MOS:SAINTS. It is not necessary for disambiguation here as the article is along amongst the articles listed at Vincentia in being spelt Vincenca (see also WP:SMALLDETAILS). 142.160.89.97 (talk) 03:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). –Ammarpad (talk) 05:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Procedural oppose speedy move. The target of is not the article for the saint. -- 65.94.42.168 (talk) 04:12, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Struck as the objection was solely to a speedy move made via WP:RM/TR. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 02:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you strike out other editors talk comments again some action will need to be taken In ictu oculi (talk) 06:53, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Agree. The strikeout in this edit was uncalled for. Andrewa (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment it is probable that a separate Vicenza (disambiguation) needs to be built out of Vincentia (disambiguation) that is the current target of Vincenca -- 65.94.42.168 (talk) 06:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose while we are crazily using Saint for some of the New Testament figures this isn't a problem. Bigger problem is that the spelling in the title is probably wrong. Vincenca is Croatian. What would the Latin or English spelling be? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * So what is your objection to Vincenca over Saint Vincenca, then? I have no particular objection to the use of a Latinate spelling, but in the absence of an alternate proposal, you have raised no concerns about the removal of the word Saint.
 * With respect to the use of the word Saint in the titles of articles about certain New Testament figures, that is done for those articles only for the purpose of disambiguation, in line with the central consensus established at MOS:SAINTS. That fact, however, is of no import here. The idea that such a move should not be made "while we are crazily using Saint for some of the New Testament figures this isn't a problem" despite the guidance provided by our MOS is a flagrant case of WP:OTHERCONTENT and is irreconcilable with WP:CONLEVEL. 142.160.89.97 (talk) 02:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I think you should register for an account. Or seek previous account to be reactivated. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Nothing wrong with using "Saint" for disambiguation purposes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.