Talk:Sakura Wars (2019 video game)

DYK hooks
So, I'm thinking about doing a potential WP:DYK nomination since it was expanded for several days. Here are some of my proposed hooks


 * ...that Project Sakura Wars, the sixth entry in the Sakura Wars series, is being developed by Sonic Team?
 * ...that Project Sakura Wars will be a soft reboot of the Sakura Wars series?
 * ...that Project Sakura Wars will feature over 40 animated cutscenes produced by Sanzigen?
 * ...that Project Sakura Wars will use a fully 3D environment?
 * ...that in Project Sakura Wars the story takes place 12 years after Sakura Wars: So Long, My Love?

More hooks will be provided before I take this to DYK soon. Any thoughts or suggestions? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Those are all good, but I think something about how long it’s been since the last entry should be includes if possible. Sergecross73   msg me  15:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay. I've added it. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * And the nomination can be found at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Sakura Wars. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Sega interview
Sega posted a video interview with Toshihiro Nagoshi on YouTube, which can be easily used as a source since it was posted on an official channel: Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Here's another source we can use: the longer interview with the development team that was just published on May 3 in Japan. . Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:52, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I can only vaguely browse through with a crudely translated version from Google Chrome, but it looks like good info from a very reliable source (Famitsu). Sergecross73   msg me  00:17, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I see. Regarding the translations, maybe we could use this tool to easily idenfity the kanji? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:56, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Reception section plans
Now that the game has been released, I think we should reorganize the reception section over the next couple of days, using the Final Fantasy XV article's own reception section as a model, so that we can send it in for a GA and an eventual FA. Any thoughts or objections? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Go for it, man. It definitely needs some huge expansion.   Red Phoenix  talk  15:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

GA ready?
Now that the peer review is over, the GA nomination should've been ready, isn't it? « I ias! : post□ :,,.I » 05:40, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Is there more work needed for this article before the GA nomination happens? I ias! :postb□xI 08:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * No one's responded then.  ias :postb□x 13:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would appear no one is pursuing this at this point. Sjones is the most prolific contributor, and while he’s around, he hasn’t been super-active in recent weeks. Sergecross73   msg me  14:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * That means it would take longer than initially expected for a Sakura Wars GT/FT to happen.  ias :postb□x 14:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Sergecross73   msg me  14:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Section break
Hey, guys. I was a little busy lately due to real-life situations, but I just probably want to revisit the article before I take it to GA. I think we should include the rest of the sources listed above so we can expand on the development section. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)