Talk:Saleh Abdall Al Oshan

responsible use of tags...
Another contributor added a Original research tag. They offered the edit summary: "Medical records: Yes it is the OR tag - because these interpretation are not in the source - '...were below the minimum healthy weight for his height...'... Not in the source at all" May I point out that the instantiation of that tag says: The edit summary is not the talk page. Interested readers who look to the talk page aren't going to read this contributor's edit summary comments.

I urge this contributor to actually read the text instantiated when he or she applies a tag, and to comply with the obligations incurred by their use of those tags. Geo Swan (talk) 07:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * No explanation being offered I have removed the tag. Geo Swan (talk) 17:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

explanation...
that i have removed from the article violates the basic rules of Wikipedia. It is the own work of a Wikipedia editor who took a primary source combined it with other sources and then interpreted it in the image description. This is a violation of WP:OR. The fact that these are mostly primary sources has also further problems as it does not comply with the policies of BLP's of living people. So i see this topic as taken to the talk page and the image should not be re-included until consensus has been reached. IQinn (talk) 08:06, 25 November 2009 (UTC)