Talk:Salem station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 17:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Criteria
1. Prose ✅

2. Verifiability ✅

3. Depth of Coverage ✅

4. Neutral ✅

5. Stable ✅

6. Illustrations ✅

7. Miscellaneous ✅

Comments
1.
 * Is North River (Massachusetts Bay) the North River in the station layout section? If so, it should be linked
 * Nope, different river. There's at least three North Rivers in Massachusetts - such imagination!
 * "After the railroads from Boston to Lowell, Worcester, and Providence were chartered in 1830 and 1831," - Wikilink the cities not already linked
 * "On June 16, 1846, the stockholders authorized the sale" - Whose stockholder's?
 * " Marblehead service was halved to one daily round trip then, and cut entirely on June 14, 1959." - This needs rephrasing
 * "Construction of $2.5 million overpass to carry Bridge Street" - Needs an "a"
 * "over the Danvers Branch and the Topsfield Branch[39] This was" - There's a period missing in here
 * "Construction of $2.5 million overpass to carry Bridge Street" - Needs an "a"
 * "over the Danvers Branch and the Topsfield Branch[39] This was" - There's a period missing in here
 * "over the Danvers Branch and the Topsfield Branch[39] This was" - There's a period missing in here
 * "over the Danvers Branch and the Topsfield Branch[39] This was" - There's a period missing in here

2.
 * The daily parking fee doesn't seem to be cited anywhere
 * "bridge began on December 1, 1985" - Maybe I misread the source, but I only say the month, not the day in the source
 * It's in the bolded title of the entry
 * Ref 47 shouldn't have the titles in all caps
 * "Construction on the garage and station began in June 2013." - This is supported by a reference from March of that year. Since delays are possible in construction projects, it would be best to have a source that demonstrates that the construction actually did begin in June, besides just planned to begin.
 * Lacking any other source to support it, I've removed the line.
 * Ref 2 needs an accessdate
 * Add an edition, if known, to the House of the Seven Gables ref. The date is given as 1893, and the book was published in 1851, so we're dealing with a later edition here
 * ✅ No edition info, but added orig-year parameter
 * Refs 48 and 49 shouldn't have the titles in all caps
 * Not all of the online refs have accessdate= parameters, these should be added.
 * ✅ I believe I've added these for all relevant refs (recent news stories, etc). Access date isn't relevant for archived sources, dated PDFs, etc.
 * Spot check of refs is clean, as is the Earwig report
 * Not all of the online refs have accessdate= parameters, these should be added.
 * ✅ I believe I've added these for all relevant refs (recent news stories, etc). Access date isn't relevant for archived sources, dated PDFs, etc.
 * Spot check of refs is clean, as is the Earwig report
 * Spot check of refs is clean, as is the Earwig report

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 23:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I believe I've fixed everything. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe that's everything. Promoting. Hog Farm (talk) 04:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)