Talk:Salisbury National Cemetery

Number buried in trenches
I added some information years ago stating that the 11,700 number was too high. At one point I even took that number out of the article, but then I put it back because it's the accepted number, with the new number as another estimate. Based on today's Salisbury Post, apparently this is a much bigger controversy than I had realized. It made the history section look cluttered so I put the controversy in its own section. I hope all my actions are acceptable and if anyone else wants to improve it further, go ahead.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  20:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)