Talk:Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd

Merge
I did not put up the merge tag but I agree with merging strongly.

I would suggest that this article (i.e. the "Salomon & Co.") article is superior layout and content and it may be easier simply to delete the other article, because I cannot see what information it contains that is not in this article. --Lucifer(sc) 16:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree this is the superior article, but I think the excerpts from the judgment which are in the other article should get copied across, possibly under a new title line of Ratio decidendi. They are widely cited, and very useful additions. Legis 17:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, on further consideration I agree with Legis.--Lucifer(sc) 18:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

I have now merged the articles copying over the excerpts as suggested though it would be helpful if someone could find out which judge said what.--Lucifer 13:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)