Talk:Salona

Redundant information concerning the Porta Ceasarea
Much of the information written in the "Porta Ceasarea" section, concerning the porta is also included in the "Episcopal center" section. I do not see a reason to repeat this material. I would suggest that in the "Episcopal center" most of that information should be replaced with a simple mention of how the Porta Ceasarea relates to the Episcopal Center, including a Wikilink to the "Porta Ceasarea" section.

Also, the text in both sections includes the sentence, "After eastern and western expansion had occurred, the gate lost their primary purpose and became carrying construction of the aqueduct." In the final phrase, "gate" is singular while the pronoun, "their" is plural. I almost just changed the pronoun to "its", but fearing that I might be missing some nuance of meaning that might be inadvertently modified by that change, I point it out here. Shortsword (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Good catch. Actually, the Porta Ceasarea is NOT a part of the Episcopal center. It was text from an earlier article version which I moved over to the Porta Ceasarea section and forgot to delete. Also there is only one Porta Ceasarea so it should be it. The Porta Ceasarea is an important part of the site and should have its own section. --Akrasia25 (talk) 19:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)