Talk:Salvation (Alphaville album)

Reviews
I just removed the following text: The German synthpop-pioneers' last album with a major label. Salvation hit the stores in 1997 and marked a tumultous time for the band: Ricky Echolette had left Alphaville during the production and Marian Gold and Bernd Lloyd were in a constant struggle with their record label which resulted in virtually no promotion for this album, and the subsequent split that led Alphaville to establishing their own, concert- and online-focused communication, promotion, and distribution platform. Even though the circumstances for Salvation were not favorable, the album became quite a success - the first one for Alphaville since their 1986 release Afternoons in Utopia. This is mainly due to the band returning to their synthpop-roots and heavily infusing them with dance/techno. A departure from the experimental predecessors, Prostitute and The Breathtaking Blue, the straighter, simpler style appealed to old fans and a younger audience alike. Musically, there is nothing new to be found - mostly well-engineered and -performed synthpop-ballads and dance/techno tunes, lyrically appealing but not stunning. Two songs that stand out are the complex and cryptic "Point of Know Return" and the elegant classic ballad "Pandora's Lullaby." Gold's voice is still one of the best in the business, used on what is -by the band's high standards- a rather mediocre album.

The reason I removed it is that the above appears to be a review of the album. This is not appropriate for Wikipedia, as it presents a POV. Please review WP:NPOV and adjust the text. It's a great write-up, but just not the right place for it without work. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 23:34, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AlphavilleSalvationUS.jpg
Image:AlphavilleSalvationUS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AlphavilleSalvation.jpg
Image:AlphavilleSalvation.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)