Talk:Salvia divinorum/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

The Salvia divinorum article does not deserve its GA status for a number of reasons: I have recently split Legal status of Salvia divinorum in the United States aout of Legal status of Salvia divinorum since the latter also suffered from systemic bias. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It is US-centric
 * It has dead external links
 * At 140kb it may too long, although the refs take up a lot of space.
 * Breaking the article into the plant and the drug topics (as per cannabis) is probably a good idea. The drug use is likeley to be of more interest to readers than the botanical information.
 * Having seperate section for UK and US news refs seems odd.
 * There is an overuse of section headings
 * The "Heat gun vaporizing" needs copy editing, reads like a how to guide and mentions a device that may be non-notable and goes unexplained.
 * Most of the concerns seem to have been addressed based on the history. As such I'm closing this as kept; if you disagree then open up a community reassessment so others can provide opinions. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 18:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)