Talk:Sam Manekshaw/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

A word to the wise. I'm going to explicitly make the rather obvious point that this article clearly did not meet the GA criteria when nominated and when the review began. I could have quickfailed it and slept well that night. But I'm going to see it through and find out if it can be brought up to scratch because I believe all experienced editors have a responsibility to help newer editors to understand what is expected at GA, and because our coverage of Indian military history topics in general is so poor. One of the likely reasons it languished in the queue for so long was probably that most regular reviewers took a look and decided they would have to fail it, and rather than do that, they just left it. I did that more than once when looking at the queue. I strongly suggest you look at all the other articles you have at GAN with an eye for the sort of detail I have raised with this article (and ask the Guild of Copy Editors for a thorough c/e), otherwise they will probably remain in the queue or be quickfailed if they are in a similar condition. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * So what would you suggest me now? Can I take to GOCE? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you mean with the other articles? If so, I suggest you go through them carefully and address the types of issues I've picked up on here, then ask for a GOCE c/e. I'll see this one through. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)