Talk:Sam Parnia

Can someone please elaborate on this heavy statement?
I'm sure I'm not the only one that's intrigued but unsatisfied by this:

"The experience was not compatible with an illusion, imaginary event or hallucination since visual (other than of ceiling shelves' images) and auditory awareness could be corroborated"

Like what visual and auditory awareness was corroborated? Was it something possible to accidentally guess? Dovmiester (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)