Talk:Sam Wasson

January 2023
Hello. I assure you that my edits are not vandalism, please stop making such unfounded accusations. The reasons for my changes are identified in each of the edit summaries. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * it is texbook vandalism, when you remove reliable sourced information. what possible consensus reason could you have for removing NYTimes and Guardian book review references? you need to demonstrate that you will comply with policy, not vindictively right all great COI wrongs. --Turktimex3 (talk) 15:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Please learn what vandalism means on Wikipedia, before you make these serious accusations. Have you looked through the Edit Summaries? The reasons for the changes are stated there. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * "Removing encyclopedic content without any reason, or replacing such content with nonsense." Vandalism. --Turktimex3 (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * That is part of the explanation (and please note the "without any reason" wording), however the key point is at the top. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * provide a reason to remove a NYTimes book review, if you have any.--Turktimex3 (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)