Talk:Samantha Geimer

I've done a partial merge. Anyone think more should be moved? --ssd 04:15, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No, I think this deserves its own article. And I have to question the wording, she was not the victim of statutory rape, but of rape. Polanski was convicted of statutory but that does not reflect the facts of the case. protohiro 17:17, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

I'd agree that it should be expanded into its own article. Mbisanz 17:24, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

I disagree - this should be mergeed, since Samantha Geier is only notable for having been raped by Polanski.XmarkX 16:01, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

As it stands, this article might as well be deleted. TheMadBaron 10:41, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

I would agree with a merge/delete Sherurcij 18:03, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

I would agree with a merge/delete/redirect; I agree with XmarkX. Tempshill 22:44, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Her only notariety comes from (according to the Roman Polanski article) having been drugged and raped by a celebrity. I think delete and allow her to be mentioned only in the one article where she's relevant. 12:05, 10 August 2005 (UTC) or 7:05 pm (CST)

I would Suggest keeping the Article, as it shows that Victim of Rape is not the only Victimization, ... as The Judge and Defense made attacks and False Claims .. as did the Media Telling more Lies than the Son of Satan. She was Victimized 3 times ... and this should be made visible to and by any with Intergrity.

Julle geimer
Pellaa youtubessa hill climb racing2 ja critical opssia 109.240.11.214 (talk) 21:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)