Talk:Same-sex marriage in Quintana Roo/Archive 1

Attribution
The text for the start of this article came from Recognition of same-sex unions in Mexico‎. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Redirect
I redirected this article. The article content was from Recognition of same-sex unions in Mexico‎ and the discussion on whether it was accurate was not finished there. We can't discuss on two article talk pages at the same time. Hekerui (talk) 21:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That's inappropriate. I have revered the redirect. Weather it is legal or not, a fork is appropriate. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It's the same thing being discussed. Now on two different places. How does this resolve the underlying issue? Hekerui (talk) 21:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * We can have a note on here directing folks there for the discussion. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Factual accuracy discussion
For the discussion, see Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in Mexico. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I am proposing that this page be merged to Recognition of same-sex unions in Mexico. There is little difference in the content on each page, so it is best to eliminate redundancy. If the section about Quintana Roo grows to be to large for the main article, I would not object to it being recreated as a separate article. West Eddy (talk) 03:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I see no problems. One observation that may be valid is the need to preserve historic record. Ref [|Talk:Same-sex marriage in Alagoas] - as legal status is changing from state to state rather than country wide, It may be appropriate to provide a table showing each state / status /date as a fast reference which is easily updated. Simple observation on how to deal with a fast changing legal issue. Does not compromise neutrality ect. just allows rational updates and expected maintenance. WP:DGAF - WP:IAR - WP:TTRLT   Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^)  (talk)  23:10, 11 May 2012 (UTC)