Talk:Samjna (concept)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saṃjñā. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20121205090810/http://www.zolag.co.uk/Cetasikas/ to http://www.zolag.co.uk/Cetasikas/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 31 January 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Saṃjñā → Samjna (Buddhism) – The word Samjna is not only used for this concept, for example it is an very important epithet of Saranyu, a Hindu goddess (For sources, see that article). Another point is the removal of sanskritised letters (as per WP:COMMON NAME) .💠 245CMR 💠. •👥📜 15:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose no reason to remove accents on Sanskrit terms; and Samjna doesn't need (Buddhism) either. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The direct meaning of Samjna from Sanskrit is "noun", "sign" or "name". This Samjna is not the only primary terms, so it is necessary to move it. Btw, the most popular use of Samjna is the grammatical use of Sanskrit-Hindi (samjna), and also Saranyu has far more veiws. .💠 245CMR 💠. •👥📜 03:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Oppose. The scope of this article is not restricted to Buddhism, and there is no reason to change it. Andrewa (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

All topics are equally important and non of them is a Primary topic. Eg, the word orange means the colour and the fruit, so leads to a disambiguation page. .💠 245CMR 💠. •👥📜 15:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with this approach but it is not current policy. Even I would not go as far as to say All topics are equally important but I certainly agree we would do far better to say none of them is a Primary topic, see User:Andrewa/Primary Topic RfC.
 * But while I am continuing to develop this proposal and hope it will eventually become policy, I do not see it happening any time soon. It probably needs generational change. Andrewa (talk) 19:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.