Talk:Samuel Bogusław Chyliński

Unexplained revert
Why did you undo my edit, which clearly improved the structure as well as the language of the article? To give just two examples for the latter: In the sentence "Samuel has studied ... before 1651" the present perfect is the wrong tense, and the phrase "used then popular ... edition" needs an article. Apart from that, it is obviously better to arrange the article chronologically than in the rather confused way it is structured now. --Schneid9 (talk) 11:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I reviewed it in a hurry and thought some information was skipped. Now reverted it back. Thank you for making it structured. -- Ke an (talk) 06:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)