Talk:Samuel Edward Konkin III

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Samuel Edward Konkin III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118104121/http://www.isil.org/resources/fnn/2004spring/sek-iii-riggenbach.html to http://www.isil.org/resources/fnn/2004spring/sek-iii-riggenbach.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Conceptually worthless
Konkin rejected voting, believing it to be inconsistent with libertarian ethics.

For my money, this article is conceptually worthless if it doesn't take up the other side of this and explain how—with no group consensus mechanism such a communal vote—this philosophy could deal with as simple a collective social problem as a townhouse where one flat's separation-anxiety stress kitten (picture a Jack Russell) barks maniacally for the entire duration of its owners' daily professional absence. &mdash; MaxEnt 23:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:07, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Samuel Edward Konkin III.png

“Although he was an atheist, Konkin liked CS Lewis and Tolkien”
Why is him being a atheist stand in supposed contradiction to him being a fan of fantasy books? 86.28.198.180 (talk) 16:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Because Lewis and Tolkien were very much not atheists, I guess. —Tamfang (talk) 04:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Merged Information from Agorism Article
I agree with the nomination for the Agorism page for deletion, so I took to taking the major definition and quote and leaving the rest behind. Very little in the way of trustworthy independent sources so an entire page restating blog posts and the creator's quotes gives a deceptive impression that this is an active place of academic or political enquiry. It is not.

I believe keeping this section on Agorism is important as it is quite pivotal information on the Ross Ulbricht article.

This is the first time I've contributed to Wikipedia in 8 or so years, and the last time was filling in niche biographical details from my region. So if anything I've done is out of order, I'd appreciate the feedback as my only intention was to improve Wikipedia. Hmcln (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

"Agorism.info" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agorism.info&redirect=no Agorism.info] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)