Talk:Samuel Frickleton/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

I'll start this in a day or two.
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * good article! I've made some minro tweaks and you can see them here The most ambitious one was moving a sentence from the 4th paragraph of Military to the fifth.  Please check that to make sure I didn't screw up citations, etc.  In terms of content, it belongs with 5th paragraph, but in terms of citations....?


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

, thanks for the review, much appreciated. Your changes all check out OK, no disrupted cites. However, for consistency with other articles for the NZ VC winners that I have worked on, I have reverted your change to the first paragraph of the lead. Instead, I have added a further sentence to the first paragraph which I believe goes some way to achieving the intention behind your own edit to the lead. Happy to revise and/or discuss further if needed. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Absolutely! much improved.  Passed.  auntieruth (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)