Talk:Samuele Bacchiocchi

Conspiracy theory
I tagged the conspiracy theory as non-neutral because it seems to be a biased account of events written by someone with a vested interest. Is it important enough to show up in any independent reliable sources? If no, I suggest it be removed altogether. --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 14:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The non-neutral is unwarrented due to the nature and subjectivity of conspiracy theories themselves. I do not have a vested interest. I wish to present other conspiracy theories that have been well documented other than the one given. User:hop_goblin ([[talk/13:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hop goblin (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedia does not judge the truth-value of conspiracy theories or any other point. Rather, it merely outlines the different arguments and those who represent them, on a disputed point (WP:NPOV). Thus it outlines who makes the argument, with the length of treatment given corresponding to the significant of the perspective. If a perspective is very small (within the context of a particular article) then it should not be mentioned at all, by due weight. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I do think the minority POV suspicious of Bacchiocchi is maybe worth including, but only very briefly per due weight. Hence I have shortened it considerably. I kept the Alberto Rivera reference, as he is the most prominent source apparently – he is notable enough to have his own Wikipedia article. However he is a very questionable source. I justify the inclusion only on the basis that a small but visible segment actually believe this. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What Colin MacLaurin did seems fine to me; it puts the source in its likely proper perspective. By the way, is there any way we could find a photo of Mr. Bacchiocchi? Kansan (talk) 03:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Samuele Bacchiocchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610132535/http://www.biblicalperspectives.com:80/books/sabbath_to_sunday/ to http://www.biblicalperspectives.com/books/sabbath_to_sunday/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)