Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Sims and I addressed the concerns. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The odd redundant word etc. I performed a copyedit, and it should be fine now. My only concern is that the WP:LEAD is very short. Even if the article is sparse, do not hesitate to make a decent lead. In particular, there is nothing on the selection and after the contest-sections. The lead should be at least twice, perhaps three times, the length.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ref 32 is published on day 0? Is date lacking, or is it a typo?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: On hold; longer lead = good article. Arsenikk  (talk)  09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: On hold; longer lead = good article. Arsenikk  (talk)  09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: On hold; longer lead = good article. Arsenikk  (talk)  09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks great. Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk)  22:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)