Talk:Sanal Edamaruku/Archive 1

Untitled
Isn't it great that someone creates a page on oneself!? And ruins the page on someoneselse!? Well done! Keep it up!!.....Skollur AND THEN REMOVE COMMENTS FROM DISCUSSION PAGE.....Skollur AND DO IT AGAIN !!!...............: Happy New Year!...Skollur

A Response to Kollur
Dear Kollur, you seem to have untreatable hatred against Sanal Edamaruku. I know at least two persons who developed the stub piece on Sanal Edamaruku. Please remember the Wikipedia policy while making malicious campaigns.

Wikipedia follows the writers' rules of engagement: Respect your fellow Wikipedians even when you may not agree with them. Be civil. Avoid making personal attacks or sweeping generalizations. Stay cool when the editing gets hot; avoid lame edit wars by following the three-revert rule; remember that there are 896,094 articles on the English Wikipedia to work on and discuss. Act in good faith by never disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point, and assume the same of others in the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary. Don't use sockpuppets to do wrong or circumvent policy. Be open, welcoming, and inclusive.

With regards, Aparna.

%%%%%%%%%%*@ #$%@#$%Good faith@#$%... wikipedia policy!!@#@#@@ ...respecting fellow wikipedians....Well, Well, Well....are you the one who contributed the present article and regularly ruins the page on others (Is it necessary to name the page?..You know it!). [If anybodyelse wants to know the user's malicious "editings", they can easly locate them by following the various user IDs the individual created or, in the abasence of it, the IP numbers. If any other users insist, I can easily provide them with the user IDs created by this user]

You talk of wikipedia policy? Why then, Sire, you remove the comments on this page? Ruin other pages?

I first came to know about you (Yes, Sire, the present userID is one among the numerous userID you created over a period of time. Keep your cool!) while tracking the wikipedia user who religiously ruined another wikipedia page. How can one have untreatable hatred against some unknown individual? Will you explain, Sire? Do you think that you are so well known that people in my hamlet talk only about you?

One of the most important wikipedia policy is that one should not create a page on onself. Keep it in mind, sire.

Atleast, don't ruin pages on others. .....Skollur

Malicious obsession!
S Kollur's malicious obsession is obvious. It is clear that "M......", a CPIM mouthpiece, is making this malicious campaign against Mr Sanal. (Should I name him?). Mr Sanal does not need to make a page on himself. We, his well-wishers and collegues, are builing up the page on him. Many more things are to be added and the page has to be improved further with additional information.

I request friends to add a list of the books authored by Sanal Edamaruku. Information on the BBC and Discovery documentaries about him also would be welcome.

Aparna Thekkethil

Aparna_Thekkethil@yahoo.com

Yes, name me
First, have a look at the editing/vandalism done by this gentleman: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sanal_Edamaruku&diff=33745791&oldid=33697602

Adding filth within my own comments! Typical of the user's vile character! In addditon to vandalising other wikipedia pages and contributing pages on oneself, he has now turned his attention to inserting filth inside some other user's comments!

Don't threaten! Yes sire, name me! Why hesitate! CPM mouthpiece...Ha..Ha..Ha..Ha.. My name start with "M..." ...Ha..Ha..Ha..Ha.. Please don't, sire, ruin some other pages! Atleast, sire, after the reversal done by User:No_Guru, you have now realised that it is foolish to delete information from discussion page! ......Skollur

If sanal ever visit this page please answer my question. Why did you and your dad become a waste to mother earth? Go commit suicide man?

Unwarranted comment
The above comment by the user having the IP address 67.167.226.43 is unwarranted.Though this wikipedia page is most probably a creation of the protagonist himself, it doesn't warrant a reaction as the one above........Skollur

A piece of an exposure
It is amazing how Skollur exposed the machinations of Sanal Edamaruku masquerading as Aparna by providing the link to the changes made by him. A right lesson to him how to debunk frauds!

I have known this person for a longtime and understood well his methods in boosting his image - surprising for a man of 50+ years! Though 50+, he is yet to come out of his adolesence in terms of maturity!

Skollur says that this person has used a number of userids to edit wikipedia. Can you spellout these userids? I am knew to Wikipedia. In fact, this is my first contribution!.- Malayali

Absurd article
This article is teeming with lousy syntex and grammar, baseles claims etc. Though this page does not deserve to be in the wikipedia, I leave that decision to other wikipedians. In the meantime I will try to fix some absured lines.GeorgeIAN

Hi, Indiedude, you are back!
You are like god in Hindu puranas. How many names you have got to vandalize wikipedia pages. Today, ie. 4 June 2006, you reappeared as S kollur and played nonsense with my user page. And then, you created links in your own page to your worthy articles. Keep it up dude!

Why did this gentleman uploaded the image of Babu Gogineni into wikipedia and then linked it to my user page (see the link to my vandalized-page: [|here] )? Why this user, who appears in wikipedia under various aliases to promote oneself, play havoc with somebodyelse' reputation? Why can't he do something useful to the society? What does he think of being a rationalist?

By the way, has the hero of this page settled his accounts with the Igeorge? See this link for details: [|here]

Skollur

No right to remove discussion page details
What right this worthy gentleman has got to erase the entire discussion page?

Did any of the readers notice that the last time this gentleman appeared under the user name Aparna Thekkethil (See this link for his contribution under this userid:[]| was to stuff nonsense in my own contribution in this discussion page. See the following link for details:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sanal_Edamaruku&diff=33745791&oldid=33697602

Now, he shouts from the rooftop on ethics! What an irony!! And when he is thoroughly exposed, he deletes the entire discussion page!!! My, My!!!! Skollur

At last the vandalizer is out from his cave
With good intention, as this discussion page is a vandalizing effort, the allegations raised are baseless personal attacks and outright patent nonsense, I thought it right to remove this page. The vandalizer never sleeps. He reverted back this page. Thanks, anyway, in the process, with a little research, I found an interesting piece of information. And a clue to the real person behind the baseless allegations. Earlier, I sincerely thougt the mischief maker is another guy, a self-proclaimed CPIM mouth piece. The readers may please visit the discussion pages of the three following links. 1) Skollur 2) S_kollur 3) Babu Gogineni

Why does he do such things?

Regards, Aparna

Hallucination?
Our Hero is definitely suffering from morbid hallucination and megalomania! But, yes, he has a right to be there at his cute little world! But what he should not do is vandalizing other wikipedia pages, especially user pages and discussion pages. He may use as many USERIDs (ostensibly female, male or even androgynous!) as he wishes, but should desist from his natural instinct to commit vandalism!

And our hero did research! What does he really mean by this term? Poor Babu Gogineni, he will be flabbergasted if he ever visit these pages! Skollur