Talk:Sancho II of Pamplona

Untitled
What is meant by "He was regarded as first or third king of Aragon"??
 * a mistake? should it really be "of Navarre"?
 * what is the source? original source, please.

Aragon was regarded as county at that time.

Navarre became later as the common name of the kingdom. At that time, Pamplona was used much.

Is this to mean that he was the first to use the name Navarre in titulary? 62.78.106.199 15:22, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Velasquita
I have books that shows Velasquita Daughter of Sancho II of pamplona or the navarra, as being marry to the 2nd Lord of Viscay. And being of the lineage where the Mendoza, Haro, And Zambrana family names began.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Fortun(o)_Sanchez_(Sangiz)_Grandee_Zambrana

Help me make my wiki look good for wikipedia. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itzcoatzin (talk • contribs) 20:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Count of Aragon
In response to the IP's changing/removing of "Count of Aragon":
 * The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 3, C.900-c.1024, ed. Timothy Reuter, Rosamond McKitterick, page 689;"To the west of the heartlands of the kingdom surrounding Pamplona lay the county of Aragon, which had been administered for the Navarrese monarchs by a line of hereditary counts since the early ninth century. Around 940 Garcia Sanchez I married Andregoto Galindez, daughter and heir of Count Galindo AznarezII, and their son Sancho Garces is recorded as ruling the county under his father from 948. By this time his parents' marriage had been dissolved, and Garcia Sanchez was remarried(in 943) to a lady called Tarasia, whose family connections are unknown. Sancho Garces II succeeded his father as king in 970, and the county of Aragon was retained under direct royal rule." --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)