Talk:Sancho VI William of Gascony

¿Sancho Guillén in Spanish? ¿Urraca of Navarre?
The article says that in "Spanish: Sancho Guillén).

I can´t understand how it is known in Spanish a person that it is unknown for the spanish, originary from a country that it´s beyond its frontiers, and that it is unrelevant in Spain´s history. Moreover when in that time, there was no Spanish language at all.

It says also that "His reign is most notable for the renewal of Gascons ties with Spain".

As far as I know, at that time he only could keep relations with his neighbours at the other side of the Pyrenes, and only with the cristian ones. It says that "Sancho was a son of William II Sánchez and Urraca of Navarre and relative of Sancho III of Navarre and he spent a portion of his life at the court of that king in Pamplona."

It´s impossible for him to be son of Urraca "of Navarre", because Navarre existed since 1150, and at that time, his mother was a little bit death.

It says that "It is possible he even submitted Gascony to the suzerainty of Navarre".

And the posibility should not be reflect in the article. Just because that it is not a fact. May be he invented the powder, but if there are not evidences... The fact is that Navarre did not exist at that time, like "Urraca of Navarre".

It says that "He certainly never paid homage to the king of France."

And that is a truth for all the Persons that lived in that epoch. The reign of France was not born at this time. And the Franks divided in three reigns Charlomagne´s empire. So neither Franks, nor French. 66.81.169.203 (talk) 10:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)