Talk:Sanctuary season 1/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll make more copyedits as I go and jot queries below: Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


 *  The main story arc taking place during the season involves the Sanctuary working against the Cabal.. - sounds cumbersome, why not just " The main story arc of the season involves the Sanctuary working against the Cabal"


 *  who plot to control all abnormals --> "who seek to control all abnormals"


 *  Fortunately, she exposes the imposter (the creature does not know Magnus hates coffee, a fact of which Will would be aware) and kills it --> "Fortunately" (POV) --> "However"


 *  However, it soon completely takes her over - sounds a bit colloquial to me. a reword'd be good but nothing comes to mind straightaway.


 *  Weathergirl Amy Saunders (Rekha Sharma) and cameraman Zach Pencer.....  - it'd be good to note the different style of this episode, and how it is in newsreel footage and from the newsreporter's POV.
 * I have done addressed the issues, are there any others? -- Matthew RD 21:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Otherwise looking more polished and on target for GA pass. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Sorry about the delay. Looking alright. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries. Thanks for the review. -- Matthew RD 12:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)