Talk:Sandra Nyanchoka

MTKing:

Thanks for your reply. Below are the criteria for Notability. I believe Sanra Nyanchoka meets them:

"A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published[3] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[4] and independent of the subject.[5]

* If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[6] * Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject."

Sandra has worked steadily since ANTM and has been featured in magazines, most recently in Essence Magazine (Dec 2011), a prominent publication, which points to the fact that she is working and in demand.

Interview/images: http://www.dc50tv.com/lifestyle/fashion/fbl/wdcw-sandra-nyanchoka-interview-gal-101910,0,6128280.photogallery
 * She was featured in DC 50’s CW 2010 Fashion, Beauty and Lifestyle (FBL) (October, 2010)


 * She was featured in an article, "Confessions of a Supermodel" in "The Visual" Magazine, p. 26 (Spring, 2011)


 * She was featured in Exodus Magazine as one of "8 Beautiful Women to Celebrate Women's Day" p. 4


 * She was on the cover of a story on hair in Essence Magazine (December, 2011). This is noted in the article.

This shows she is still a focus of interest and is still working for name publications. THis fits the criteria of "multiple secondary sources" in my opinion.

Please let me know if you would like any more sources. Thank you.
 * None of these are significant coverage, please wait till there is a consensus that she is notable. Mt  king  (edits)  20:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)