Talk:Sandra Oh/Archive 1

Improv Games
sandraoh.com says she was in the improve games. true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.153.83 (talk) 18:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Andrew Orr
Who is Andrew Orr, and why is it useful to note that Ms Oh had a locker next to his at one time? 14:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

In/On (syntax trivia)
As I posted some notable roles for Sandra Oh, I noticed that I/we say on a continuing TV show such as Grey's Anatomy but in a movie such as Sideways. YMMV Bellagio99 15:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Biography assessment rating comment
WikiProject Biography Assessment

Could use more detail and a better pic-- but still basically a B.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 05:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Photograph
Didn't there used to be a picture here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.130.76 (talk • contribs)
 * What a terrible photograph: (1) the angle obscures most of her face and what's left is half-covered with hair; (2) it's a still shot of a conversation she's having with someone about five miles out of frame; (3) the overall crappy quality screams "camera phone." For all we know, it actually depicts Michael Jackson. Will someone please help to find a better pic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.43.106 (talk • contribs)
 * For one of People's 50 most beautiful people, perhaps there could be a mor flattering picture, instead of the one of her looking tired and messy currently in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.35.220 (talk • contribs)
 * I disagree. She's not a classic beauty. Her "earthiness" (e.g. "messy") is part of her charm. YMMV. Bellagio99 15:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In the current picture you can hardly see her face. I suggest that a photo that shows frontal face be used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.143.231 (talk • contribs)
 * Agreed, anyone have a better picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fre k (talk • contribs)
 * Yes, that is a hideous pic. But is there a pic of her that's not?  She's nasty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.244.215.51 (talk • contribs)

Only free use images are to be used to identify a person. Any image uploaded must have a verifiable copyright status. Just64helpin 18:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

http://www.sandraoh.com/ Try asking there. --Hitsuji Kinno 07:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Birthday?
Is it 20 July 1971 or 30 November 1970? IMDb had changed back and forth a few times now --Fallout boy 22:03, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Her official website says it is 20 July 1971 (but I have not been able to verify if that site is affiliated with her)

I also cannot find her valid birthday... About website posts it as 30 November 1970, while IMDb has it as 20 July 1971. And as the earlier user stated, IMDb has changed that date back and forth. Does anyone have a reference to an actual, credible record? But because her official website posts her DOB as 20 July 1971, I believe we should keep it as that, for the mean time. User: dwolgel --AJ24

1971 cannot possibly be here birth year. My wife was in a drama class with her in high school in Ottawa. My wife was born in 1968 and Sandra Oh was a grade ahead of her, meaning she was likely born in 1967. She may have skipped a grade, and thus have been born in 1968, but it's unlikely she was two or more grades ahead of my wife, making a birth year of 1969 or later EXTREMELY unlikely. 1967 is our best bet! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwolgel (talk • contribs) 17:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Most sources on the Internet give her birthdate as July 20, 1971. Some give it as November 30, 1970. None of these are official sources, however, and the bio on her official site is silent on the matter. I have sent an e-mail to United Talent (her agency) requesting confirmation. As the majority of sources currently use the 1971 date, I think we should stick with that until we find a reliable source that states otherwise .Sunray 21:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

A lie repeated over and over in cyberspace is still a lie. It is impossible that Sandra Oh was born in 1971. As I said, she was a year ahead of my wife at Sir Robert Borden high, which means she was likely born in 1967. If she skipped a grade, she could have been born in 1968; two grades, in 1969; three grades, in 1970. If she were born in 1971, she would have had to have skipped four full grades to be ahead of my wife in school. She was not born in 1971. Also, sandraoh.com looks like a fan site to me. Also, United Talent can't be trusted necessarily, since, unfortunately, in Hollywood, a 36-year-old actress is more bankable than a 40-year-old, meaning the agent/agency that represents her has a vested interest in saying she was born in 1971. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwolgel (talk • contribs) 13:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * i have little doubt that every claim you make may indeed be accurate. however, changes cannot be made to wikipaedia without substantiation and a clear violation of policy. if you can show that he birth is indeed what you say it is, simply provide a reliable source. --emerson7 | Talk 15:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

I contacted the United Talent Agency and confirmed that her birthdate is as we have it: July 20, 1971. Sunray 22:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

United Talent Agency is not telling the truth. She is at least 39, and more likely 40, for the reasons stated above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.56.248.54 (talk) 01:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

2 best movies she has made
"Oh is most familiar to American audiences from her roles in the films Under the Tuscan Sun and Sideways. She considers Sideways to be one of the two best movies she has made, along with Evelyn Lau.[4] " The citation's under a pay wall, but Evelyn Lau isn't a movie, she's a person. The film's name seems to be The Diary of Evelyn Lau but I can't check the citation so I'm not editing it. Anyone who can see the article want to check this out? 174.88.219.67 (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Personal Life
"In late 2005, she began a relationship with musician Andrew Featherston which started in 2007."

Time machine? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.165.48.109 (talk) 02:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Sandra Oh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100513003536/http://www.thepeoplespeak.com:80/pages/credits/ to http://www.thepeoplespeak.com/pages/credits/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 05:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Korean name?
Since her parents are both Korean immigrants, it is unlikely that she has no Korean name. Oh= 오 吴. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.43.230.154 (talk) 03:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

why does it say "this is a Korean name; the family name is Oh"? Actually you could say it's a Canadian name, since she's Canadian and the family name is stated second, in the Canadian, English, North American, general European style. Also her middle name is given, and it looks like it would probably be Korean. My point is, she's not Korean, she's Canadian; pretty much everyone's last name has to be something, unless they made it up. My last name is Larson, but if there were a Wikipedia article about me, I don't think it would say "This is a Swedish name. Larson is the family name". If the name was given as Oh Sandra, then the comment would make sense. Maybe it's left over from a previous time when there was some dispute about the name. I'm going to delete the comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neurodog (talk • contribs) 23:46, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Well, I did plan to delete it, but it seems to be privileged or something; can't see it in the source when I try to edit.Wood Monkey 23:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neurodog (talk • contribs)

Why Vandalism?
I am puzzled by the frequent vandalism of this page, really hostile and silly remarks about Ms Oh's appearance. Does anyone have any insight as to why people do such things? Is there any research on the subject? Bellagio99 14:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not an expert on the subject, but I'll contribute my own personal inclinations on the matter. The gist of it is that, to Asian or Asian-American eyes, Sandra Oh is not in the least attractive, and certainly not attractive enough to merit People's top 50 or all the attention that she's been getting from the (White-dominated) media. Acting talent aside, Asians/Asian-Americans feel that such compliments could and should be paid to more deserving individuals, and that, to put it frankly, non-Asians are a poor judge of Asian beauty. Hence the hostility. Note: I understand this is borderline "personal opinion," but I only posted it as a plausible response to the above question. Sophrosune  (talk)  15:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * you sound like a complete tool Sophrosune. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.23.238 (talk) 06:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

By that same token, were a Korean entertainment magazine to do a "50 most beautiful people" issue, should they only choose Koreans? By your argument, Koreans are unable to identify white or black beauty, then. Jwigton 06:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

"Sandra Oh is not in the least attractive." That's really harsh, and presumptuous to speak for the majority of the world's population. Sandra Oh is not any less attractive than Julia Roberts or Drew Barrymore (who made People's list). To be sure, I don't think Sandra Oh is remarkable beautiful, but I'm sure there are more than 50 people in the world more beautiful than any of the people the People magazine selected. Maybe it's not that non-Asians are poor judges of beauty but that People magazine is a poor judge of beauty. The whole ranking is pretty goofy to begin with so it's a shame that same people are so rude to an actress who seems like a decent human being. Penser (talk) 03:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)penser

I'd also point out that it's completely inappropriate and nonsensical to claim that Asians are the only people entitled to decide whether a woman of Asian heritage is objectively beautiful or not. Bearcat (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Personally, I've always thought Sandra Oh is hot. On the other hand, she certainly isn't a classic beauty, certainly not in the same league as Julia Roberts. If some people think she's ugly, I can understand that, but what of it? She's a good and interesting actress. A doctor I used to know, who's Korean, said that his wife (also Korean) considered Ms Oh to be the ugliest Korean woman she'd ever seen. To which I replied that she must not have seen Margaret Cho. That got a good laugh. I didn't bring up the fact that I thought Oh is hot. So maybe there's something to the idea that she's not attractive by Korean standards? Maybe because she lets her hair down. I don't know. Again, who cares whether she's attractive or not? If you're attracted, as I am, then be attracted. If not, not. It seems more like some expression of hostility toward her than simply an esthetic judgment. So what she's done to arouse all this hostility?Wood Monkey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neurodog (talk • contribs) 23:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)