Talk:Sanjiv Saraf

Possible to review again?
Hi @331dot, I have removed unsourced claims from this draft and added further references from websites like Forbes India. Is it possible for you to review this article again? Let me know if anything else is necessary to improve this before moving it to the namespace. Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 03:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm curious as to why you've taken up this draft, and also as you are an experienced user why you don't just move it yourself if you think it's ready. 331dot (talk) 07:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @331dot
 * When notability is in question on English Wikipedia, topics I think are notable sometimes don’t turn out to be notable. A recent article Draft:I Gedé Gita Purnama Arsa Putra is an example.
 * I have been a reader of the Rekhta website and participant of their events in the past where I have listened to Sanjiv Saraf a few times. The draft was brought to my attention by an employee of the Rekhta Foundation last week after a conversation in an online forum last week. So, not being sure if this would be COI editing or not, I decided to make appropriate changes and removing unsourced claims. But, thought it might be useful for the original reviewer to see if it indeed meets the notability criteria.
 * Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other questions. Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 12:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, if you have communicated with an employee, that is a conflict of interest that should be declared. And yes, it should be submitted for a review as you have. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 12:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @331dot Oh, thank you for this clarification. Is there a process for this declaration? Shall I create another section on the talk page for this? Sure, no hurries. Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 12:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:COI for instructions on how you can disclose. 331dot (talk) 14:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I just learnt something new. Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 15:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)