Talk:Sanjukta Chakravorti

Having reservation on moving this article to main namespace
Dear, I consider you as a very seasoned reviewer but please do forgive me if I am crossing any line by questioning your judgement. This entity is yet not ready for a main article namespace move because as a scholar her h-index is very much low to qualify WP:ACADEMIC or WP:NPROF. She is a WP:TOOSOON case. I would humbly request if you could please reconsider your decision on this. However, if I am wrong in my assessment, then I would request you to help me with my understanding so that I can take right calls in future page assessments. Thank you. - Hatchens (talk) 03:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Hatchens - I accepted the article based on a combination of two considerations. First, the criterion for accepting a draft is supposed to be that the article is thought to have at least a 50% likelihood of surviving an AFD.  Most reviewers actually are much stricter, and I usually also am.  Second, I made a judgment about systemic bias, that she represents multiple under-represented demographics as a female Asian scientist.  So I decided to take a chance.  That is why I accepted the article.  I see that you might disagree.  I do not plan to reconsider my acceptance, but I will not be annoyed if you nominate it for AFD.  Is that sort of clear?  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for sharing the interpretation. This (interpretation) I will take as a part of my learning. And, I will not nominate it for WP:AFD because my primary intent is to learn, and since it's the case of "under-represented demographics" of a "female Asian scientist"... you've my undaunted support. - Hatchens (talk) 04:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Do not remove comments from talk pages. It is disruptive.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)