Talk:Santa Fe Depot (San Diego)/GA1

GA Reassessment
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Union Station (San Diego)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.


 * "The magnificent complex ...". If "magnificent" is a quote, then it needs to be attributed. Otherwise it looks like peacock language.


 * "... as a 'monumental reminder'... ". Quotations need to be attributed.


 * "... as intended to harmonize with the Spanish Colonial Revival Style buildings of the Exposition". What Exposition?


 * "The new edifice featured a covered concourse some 650 feet (198.1 m) long by 106 feet (32.3 m) wide, with a main waiting room measuring 170 feet by 55 feet." Need to consistently provide conversions from imperial to metric throughout the article.


 * "The grand interior space of the depot ..". Who says it's "grand"?


 * What's the source for the information in the second paragraph of Architecture?


 * Relevant pictures in the two galleries need to be incorporated into the body of the article. Those that can't be should be linked to in commons.


 * "Though some have claimed that the facility was built merely to appease the citizens of San Diego, the Santa Fe Depot remains an important part of the City's history, culture, and economy." Who are these some? Needs referencing to a reliable source.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * As these issues remain outstanding, this article has now been delisted. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)