Talk:Santa Rosa Science and Technology High School

Speedy Deletion Contest and Justification
As a current student of Santa Rosa Science High School, I just wanted the best, so as to improve this page, by means of updating and adding information, which are reliable, because it is based on the SRSTHS Revised Student Handbook 2008. It was issued by our Principal last week, with this I am just updating the whole article. Please reconsider the speedy deletion nomination. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vested Science (talk • contribs) 14:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Sorry, but if you are basing the article on a 'copy and paste' style then you are in violation of copyright on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, we can't use material from other sources word-for-word. For that reason, I feel it must be deleted until a fundamental rewrite is published. Thanks -- eric dilettante' (mailbox)  14:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Violation
Please Specify what part of the article does the I violate. Is it our ESEP Curriculum? Or any other.
 * Everything, to start off the article is really messy and needs major clean-up, has poor spelling and doesn't follow the proper style for articles on Wikipedia. Also, you just admitted your basing this article of a published handbook. On top of that, nothing is cited. I have said my opinion and will leave the decision to the administrators; until then, please don't remove the deletion tag, someone may revert your edits and mark them as vandalism. Happy editing! -- eric dilettante' (mailbox)  14:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and looking at the actual text will reveal some biased opinions in the article itself, looking more like an advertisment. -- eric dilettante' (mailbox)  14:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

And also I'm not the only one who edited this first, other things are based on true events, like the "current status" I'm not saying that the whole article is based on a book only! Some of it are base, but it is relatively few. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vested Science (talk • contribs) 15:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Violation
Our Student Handbook is intended to be given to all the students of our school. It is a basis for us. We can use it for the purpose related to our school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.147.100.2 (talk) 14:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for proving my point, that's why we don't base all the sources from the source itself. -- eric dilettante' (mailbox)  14:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

- Our Handbook is a primary source and the only source it is from the DepEd and the Principal, because everything to be followed is in that hand book. If you want to disapproved me, just give 1 more source that I can use, I will consider your complain and I will rewrite the whole of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.147.100.2 (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC) --115.147.100.2 (talk) 14:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A good article is based upon multiple sources, not just one or two. I can't emphasis on the importance of that. It provides unbiased opinions and gives a good view on the article itself, entirely. Happy editing. -- eric dilettante' (mailbox)  14:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * These means that you cannot cite another source, but I haven't just referred these into the primary sources. I have also secondary persons, they are the ones who explained and elaborated the school policies. And why should be the Principal be biased? The Handbook is the fruit of being unbiased, so that's why it is revised to accomodate the views of all. One more thing - How can I refer the ISBN # of the Book, the Book was given to us without ISBN. Another thing, if you wanted a clean-up, why should you post this into the Candidate for Speedy Deletion. #.--Vested Science (talk) 14:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Justification
- It has passed the following criteria:

GENERAL

G1 - I have been allowed to edit this page, for the betterment of the article. (I have a good-faith to improve this page, I didn't intended to have a poor writing) *This can still be improved

G2 - This is not a sand-box of mine, but the actual

G3 - No vandalism, Pure Facts

G4 - Obviously, This was not deleted

G5 - I am not a banned user

G6 - I had had no uncontroversial maintenance here, I have just updating and cleaning up the old ones

G7 - The author doesn't request speedy deletion

G8 - This article doesn't depend on deleted or non-existent pages

G9 - Not directly from the Foundation

G10 - There are no threatening messages to the subject

G11 - If this would be true "Board of Trustees" Others like MaSci will be included. And I am not promoting anything, it is against equity

G12 - The Student Hand Book that I used has a free license for us students

ARTICLE

A1 - It states complete description, history and current status

A2 - It is not a Foreign Language Wikipedia Project

A3 - It has a content (Lot's of them)

A5 - This not transwikied

A7 - This is important and the same like, the National Science High School of the Philippines

A9 - It is history and it is just like the justification in A7

REDIRECTS

R2 - No redirect

R3 - Not a typos or misnomers

FILES

F1 - F11 *Ask if justification is needed

CATEGORIES

C1 - C2 *Ask if justification is needed

USER PAGES

U1 - U3 *Ask if justification is needed

TEMPLATES

T2 - T3 *Ask if justification is needed

PORTALS

P1 - P2 --- --Vested Science (talk) 15:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I have removed the material that violates the G11 speedy criterion. Please refrain from using the first person (we, our, etc.) or from inserting a raw mission statement. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks Blanchardb, per stated above I tagged the article with an unsourced tag and dated it. Please be sure to follow the advice posted above when editing the page. Please be aware that if the page is not properly cited with reliable sources within a timely manner then it might be nominated for deletion again. Thanks for your time and Happy editing! -- eric dilettante' (mailbox)  16:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It wasn't there when I removed the speedy tag. :-) Thanks for the heads up. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Case Closed
I admit my mistake, I will re-edit the whole article with unbiased information. "*Can I Delete this Discussion as the conflict is resolved."--Vested Science (talk) 11:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, as it is important to retain record of past discussion to explain the rationale the history of the article to future editors. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:55, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
All the information here is incorrect. Source: SSG (Supreme Student Government) of Sci-Tech. One of my friend who study in Sci-Tech said that the information in Wikipedia of Santa Rosa Science and Technology High School are all incorrect.--Devoted Scientist (talk) 14:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

PROPOSAL FOR TOTAL REVISION OF THE PAGE OF SANTA ROSA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HIGH SCHOOL
AS ONE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SUPREME STUDENT GOVERNMENT, THE STUDENT COUNCIL OF THE SCHOOL, WE REQUEST FOR A TOTAL REVISION OF THIS PAGE TO END UP ALL OF THE FOREGOING ARGUMENTS.

AS THIS REVISION GOES, WE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE STUDENT COUNCIL SHOULD BE THE ONE TO UPLOAD THE CONTENTS OF THE PAGE. ALL CONTENTS TO BE UPLOADED SHOULD BE IN LINE WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF THE STUDENT HANDBOOK OF THE SCHOOL AS WELL AS IN COMPLIANCE AND NON-CONTRADICTORY WITH THE LAW CREATING SANTA ROSA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HIGH SCHOOL, THE REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9083. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.146.162.110 (talk) 12:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)