Talk:Santiago Abascal

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Santiago Abascal discursando em frente a apoiadores, em fevereiro de 2019.png

Far-right label of Vox party
@Googleguy007 Regarding whether we call it "far-right political party Vox" in this article, or "national-conservative political party Vox", and your comments when edit-warring with my edits.

You are seemingly making these edits solely on your belief that leftists are targeting this page, as shown in your last revision. &mdash; Please, don't misrepresent my comments, I said IMHO national conservative is precise and broad description of Vox ideological positions, while far right (Far-right politics, or right-wing extremism as corresponding article calls it) is just favorite tag of left-wing activists to claim somebody is nazi.

“National Conservatism” is a less known descriptor that only describes a subset of Voxs beliefs, far-right describes them broadly &mdash; If "national conservatism" is a less known descriptor to you, perhaps you should start educating yourself, at least read the corresponding article, prior to engaging into edit-warring.

If you just read "national conservatism" and "far-right" article side-by-side, you'll see that the former one actually talks about ideological points; and the later one just goes right away into claiming a group described as "far-right" is extremist, radical, authoritarian, heir of fascism, nazism, and falangism, chauvinist, xenophobe, theocrate, rascist &mdash; thus it does not describe any particular ideology, it just works as an alias for all these insults. Birdofpreyru (talk) 15:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Cry about it. That’s how it’s describe by the vast majority of reliable sources, that’s how it’s going to be described. Googleguy007 (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * That's how it is described by selected "reliable" left-wing sources. Birdofpreyru (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you want to contest a sources reliability you can do it at perennial sources, this isn’t the place to complain about “left wing bias”. Googleguy007 (talk) 16:37, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Sources are fine, but you are interpreting them in a stupid way, because a lack of education =D Birdofpreyru (talk) 01:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)