Talk:Sapa Inca

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 25 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Samuel Vigneault.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
I think this article seriously needs to be worked on. For example, the article starts by quoting the theory of multiple, concurrent Inca emperors. This theory is not universally accepted. -- toivotuo 08:19, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Who doesn't accept it? Maybe we can site this critic? The page needs more content as well, as do most of the Supa Inca's pages... maybe you could work on em? Zenyu 14:18, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)


 * It's more like: Who DOES accept it? The primary sources, such as Fr. Cobo and Poma de Ayala's accounts, are in fairly strong agreement that there was a monarchy rather than a diarchy. The only major scholar in favor of a diarchy is Zuidema. Moseley, too, favors a non-monarchic model, though one differing from Zuidema's. Mainstream academic opinion is in favor of the primary documents. Historian Brundage and the archaeologist D'Altroy are notable specialists in favor of the monarchic model. It is worth, I think, mentioning the academic debate, but certainly not portraying the moietal diarchy as the model of Inka government. D.E. Cottrell (talk) 06:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

The Truth
It’s Saba Inca and only the American Indian(Aboriginals, the copper colored race wear our nation’s title. Mexicans are not us and no other nation. We were already here when all invaders came. And it’s a disgrace to attach African to our title Americans. We honor who we are, can’t say the same for you all. But the day of reckoning is on the way. You all are the abomination that will cause the earth to be desolate. And you will be no more when we come back. 2601:249:4001:8DD0:1C32:E701:4EEA:9607 (talk) 22:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Ref probably needs a fix
The ref looks like its attached to the Sapa Inca template Danial Bass (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)