Talk:Saqib Ali/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * After more througly seeing the article, it seems there are too many problems, and must unfortunately fail. Once these issues are adressed, feel free to nominate it again at WP:GAN. Warrior  4321  05:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Lead

 * A lead of this article size would require one to two paragraphs. Perhaps adding another paragraph is needed, as there is more information about South Asians and politics than there is about himself.
 * The lead talks more about South Asians and politics (as mentioned in previous comment), than it talks about himself. The lead should be more about Saqib Ali : his life, his family etc.

MOS

 * There a few one/two sentence sections
 * There are too many quoations. Every section has atleast a quoation. Too many quoations are not needed ; it makes the article look lazy.
 * The quoations are not attributed to the person who said them in the article itself.
 * The career section is empty. ✅
 * The legislative notes sub-section should be in paragraph form, not list form.

Images

 * The image placed in this article has a very high chance that it was not taken by that user. The user has had many copyright problems with other images. The image placed in this article has a very high chance that it was not taken by that user. The user has had many copyright problems with other images.