Talk:Sara Diamond (sociologist)

Not enough verifiable sources?
The article currently provides two links in the "Sources" section, neither of which are verifiable, at the moment. When I try to access the link to the subject's CV, I get a "Fatal Error" page, but I'm not removing it in the hopes that it's just a temporary glitch on the berkeley.edu site. When I try to access the other link for the "Contemporary Authors Online", I get a login page. Given this, I'm adding a "Refimprove" template to the article. Cheers! -- Bgpaulus (talk) 21:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 31 March 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

– WP:NOPRIMARY. See pageviews. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 00:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sara Diamond → Sara Diamond (sociologist)
 * Sara Diamond (disambiguation) → Sara Diamond
 * |Sara_Diamond_(college_president)|Sara_Diamond_(singer)|Sara_Diamond_(disambiguation) Pageviews here 162.208.168.92 (talk) 00:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination. The nine-sentence stub for the sociologist is not the primary topic. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom and per Roman Spinner. I wonder, in fact, if it might be possible to have a bot identify similar cases, where there is a primary topic article and a disambiguation page for that title, but the topic occupying the base page name is a stub and/or has relatively few pageviews relative to other topics sharing the name. BD2412  T 22:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In terms of long-term significance as well as in terms of usage, none of the entries in the disambig page is predominant. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 06:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Support No objections. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)