Talk:Sara Evans/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 02:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This was a very informative article. I'm hit and miss on her music, but I'm surprised at how tumultuous her personal life has been.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I made a few edits here and there to clean up wording. Things to watch for: consistency on Evans' vs. Evans's; avoiding use of seasons to refer to time (e.g. "summer 2005"); and overlinking.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I made a couple minor tweaks to include a bit more info on singles.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Per MOS:ALT, please make sure to include alt text on images where applicable.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As usual, good work on all fronts. This one just needed a few minor touchups that I was able to tend to without any further input.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As usual, good work on all fronts. This one just needed a few minor touchups that I was able to tend to without any further input.