Talk:Sarada Uchiha/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 22:40, 22 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Grabbing this for a review. Aoba47 (talk) 22:40, 22 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Revisited furthermore. Sorry, I had to sleep eariler yesterday Aoba47. Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing my comments so far. Do not feel pressured to address them right away; you can take a few days to to get to everything. I will collapse the comments above and provide a new round for my review sometime soon. Some of the comments from above still have not been addressed though so I will repeat them in my new round of comments. There are still several issues in the article so there needs to be more work to get to the GA level. Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Second round of comments
 * I still believe that these two sentences (Masashi Kishimoto's brother, Seishi, found it surprising that Sarada was the protagonist of the Naruto spin-off manga based on the fact his brother relied on a female character for a series to a male demographic. All the research his brother did to including guides to write to develop her character amused him.) would be better suited for the “Concept and creation” section rather than the “Reception” section. I would also revise these sentences as they read awkwardly. I would change it to: (Masashi Kishimoto's brother, Seishi, found it surprising that Sarada chosen as the protagonist for a Naruto spin-off manga since the franchise primarily appealed to a male demographic. Seishi wrote a guide to better develop the character.).
 * Moved.
 * This sentence needs revision (However, he said that he felt pressure when he was developing her character for the Naruto spin-off because she was a female character, not male like Naruto Uzumaki contrasting the demographic of the series.).It is written very awkwardly and needs to be phrased better.
 * Done (I think)
 * I have revised it further for you. Aoba47 (talk) 19:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I do not understand this sentence (Kishimoto read several books about women to select the right characteristics for Sarada's personality.). What books did he read about women? This is very unclear.
 * Done. He never said the specific books though.
 * It is still unclear what is mean by this sentence. What do you mean by "women's traits"? What "characteristics" were initially chosen for Sarada and later given to Chocho? This needs further context about what he was researching. In my previous comments, I was referencing that more so than the actual titles of the books themselves. Aoba47 (talk) 19:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * In this sentence (In the end, he gave them instead to another character), I am not sure what you mean by “them”. I understand that it connects back to this phrase (the right characteristics for Sarada's personality), but it would better to state which characteristics were given to Chocho.
 * I do not know what you mean by this part (or the finale of the Naruto spin-off). Which Naruto spin-off are you talking about? You will need to provide the full title and link it as you have not used it in the body of the article up until this point.
 * Done.
 * This sentence (For the finale of the Naruto spin-off, Kishimoto wanted it to end with the focus on Sarada's family and not Karin, a supporting character who, while being relevant to the story due to Sarada thinking she was her actual mother, was left up to the readers' imagination) needs to be revised.
 * Done.
 * It is still written rather poorly to be honest. How is this part (and not Karin, a supporting character who, while being relevant to the story due to Sarada thinking she was her actual mother, was left up to the readers' imagination) relevant to this article? It seems more appropriate for the article on the Karin character than this. Aoba47 (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * This sentence (During the making of the Boruto: Naruto the Movie film, some scenes involving Sarada's interactions with Boruto were removed because of time constraints but in the end, Kishimoto's most important scene between these two was kept: Boruto motivating Sarada to becoming the Hokage in the future.) needs to be revised to make it flow with the other parts of the paragraph. I noticed that you have revised, but expanding it with more information is not what I meant.
 * I would move these two sentences as a footnote in the "Appearances" section as it does not really belong in the "Concept and creation" section. Aoba47 (talk) 19:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

You have done a lot of great work here, but there are a number of issues with the prose. I would encourage you to go through my comments (and do not feel pressured to do it quickly. You can take as long as you want). I hope you find this review helpful. Aoba47 (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * For this sentence (Sarada is the central character of the spin-off manga Naruto Gaiden: The Seventh Hokage and the Scarlet Spring, searching for her estranged father.), I disagree with the placement of this phrase (searching for her estranged father). I would just revise the sentence to (As the central character of the spin-off manga Naruto Gaiden: The Seventh Hokage and the Scarlet Spring, Sarada searches for her estranged father.).
 * Done.
 * Revise this (Additionally, she is mistakenly feeling she and Sakura) to (Additionally, she mistakenly feels she and Sakura).
 * Done.
 * For this part (due to similarities between her and a woman, Karin), I would replace “a woman” with a better descriptive phrase. The phrase “a woman” is very generic and does not help a reader get any sort of understanding on how this character is.
 * Gave her a further description.
 * This phrase (At the happy thought of seeing Sasuke after many years) reads awkwardly and could use from revision, particularly the part “At the happy thought”.
 * Changed.
 * You introduce Karin twice in the “Appearances” section and repeat that Sarada thinks that she is her daughter.
 * Done. I think.
 * I have revised this part for you. Aoba47 (talk) 19:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I am still not a fan of the overall structure of the “Reception” section. For instance in the first paragraph alone, you cover criticism of the romance between Sasuke and Sakura, Sarada’s interactions with her father, Sarada’s comparison to Boruto, and Sarada’s dream of becoming Hokage. There should be more of a cohesive narrative here. I would encourage you to look through the source that I have provided from my previous comments and try to organize the sections by clearer topics and group similar ideas within paragraphs together.
 * The structure/flow for the "Reception" section still needs work. Some topic sentences would be a good start to help with organization. Aoba47 (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * In the first paragraph, you say that the character received a “mostly positive” response, but I see a lot of negative criticism that appears to contradict this.
 * Done.


 * Done. Thanks for the comments.Tintor2 (talk) 18:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Additional comments
 * The "Media data and Non-free use rationale" box for the image in the "Concept and creation" section needs to be completed. Aoba47 (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Removed. The image is not crucial or helpful to explaining her character.
 * This sentence (Critical reception to Sarada has initially mixed due to how Sarada questions her paretage. ) is not necessarily true as the criticism was pointed towards other aspects of the character. Also, "parentage" is misspelled. Aoba47 (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Change.
 * I do not know what you mean by this sentence (Similarly, the novels include Sarada's role in the anime.). What are "the novels" you are referring to? Aoba47 (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Fixed. Boruto has about four novels more or less that retell the events of the anime.
 * I have also added responses to my comments above so please let me know if have addressed those. Aoba47 (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Tried redoing the reception section Aoba47.Tintor2 (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * EDIT: I tried reorganizing the reception into three paragraphs: one about her traits, one about her relationships and one about merchandising. I'll see if I can improve it better tomorrow Aoba47.Tintor2 (talk) 01:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments. It is definitely moving in the right direction. Let me know when you have completed the edits. I think that this is almost there, and I think that once everything is settled down with that section, then I will hopefully pass it soon. Have a great night! Aoba47 (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Back from work. I tried separating the more and more the two paragraphs while adding a bit more about Sarada's English actress. Don't know what else to do Aoba47.Tintor2 (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Verdict
 * Thank you for replying to my comments. I will ✅ this. Aoba47 (talk) 18:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)