Talk:Sarah Franklin

Sullivan reference
There is an article in a 1996 AMS Notices wherein Michael Sullivan makes some criticisms of Sarah Franklin's work. There is a coordinated effort to suppress this information from this article by several anonymous IPs, all of which Geolocate shows to be in London. I am hoping this is not a COI effort to control the public image of the subject and I'm further hoping it will cease. Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC).

Sullivan reference again
Another individual, acting through the WP:SPA account Albertinabrooks, is now attempting to whitewash this article of the legitimate WP:RS criticism expressed in the Sullivan reference. COI now seems evident, as the one edit from that account has also added unsourced information that only the subject herself or a close colleague or student are likely to know. I ask a bit more stridently this time: please do not remove any sourced material from this article, including the Sullivan reference. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2011 (UTC).

Another SPA Whitewashing the Sullivan reference
Another WP:SPA account Sbf25 is now trying to whitewash by deleting the legitimate WP:RS criticism expressed in the Sullivan reference. Please do not remove any sourced material from this article, including the Sullivan reference. Agricola44 (talk) 15:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC).