Talk:Sarah Gadon

Awards table format change
FTR, I do not like the new 'Awards' table format, and prefer the previous 'Years'-first format. There is no advantage to an 'Awards'-first table format, and I find the info much harder to parse in this format... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

assessment
I used Rater, and it judged the article to be a 'B'. Not sure what's missing, though, that keeps it a 'C'. Alaney2k (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * What is "Rater"? Is this some kind of script? If you've been using this for all of your assessments, I definitely find its assessments questionable at best (as it seems to be consistently "inflating" assessment ratings IMO)... In any case, 'B'-class has like 6 specific criteria that need to be met, and articles should be checked by knowledgeable editors ("by hand") before being assessed as 'B'. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes Rater is a script. Then an editor reviews what it suggests and sets the values. It then does the actual edit to the file. Articles do move up from stub to start to C, etc. over time, so it is completely normal for them to change when a review is done. Pretty rare for an article to go down a level over time. Anyway, Rater provides an estimate, which I have found to be pretty good for a script. I disagree with it no more that 5% of the time, I'd say. I have been editing since 2006, I feel like I have a good general idea how to do this. Of course, I do admit I am not perfect. Alaney2k (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)