Talk:Sarah Hills

Independent article
Although I think Sarah Hills was a major enough character to potentially have a separate article, the article that was created contained only two references - one confirming the character's name and the other stating that the actress would return. The rest was unreferenced. However, even referenced it's potentially short enough to stay in the list. – anemone projectors – 14:56, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I kinda agree. This article has been tagged for needing real-world perspective, and the two sources added aren't going to cut it. Maybe it should be built up in the list first, and then if notability is established, moved to the mainspace? - JuneGloom07    Talk  20:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree. – anemone projectors – 10:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

It does not appear that the article has improved much since its 2015 incarnation and still doesn't give claim to character notability. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I still agree. It would need someone to dedicate some work to it, but we're more focused on current characters at the moment. — ᴀnemone  ᴘroᴊecтors  11:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)