Talk:Sarah McDaniel

Heterochromia
She may not have it and just wear a contact lens. Also, I don't think an article explaining what heterochromia is is a good source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.66.70.59 (talk • contribs)
 * True, she may not have heterochromia. She might also be an alien visitor from, say, Neptune, but per WP:BLP we would need WP:Reliable sources before making an allegation like that. The only sources I can find of the allegation that it's a contact lens are gossip on blogs and social media. But we do have a reference from Forbes which is primarily about McDaniel's eyes, as made clear in its headline, which then goes on to a lengthy explanation about heterochromia. If someone notable accuses her of that in a WP:Reliable source, then we can write about that. But so far, nobody seems to be keen to libel her about this publicly, so the only thing we can write is what we can WP:Verify. Wikishovel (talk) 10:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Honestly if you watch the music video and look at her eyes you can see the contacts. Her dad and sister outted her that she has two brown eyes with pictures to prove it. Saying she doesn't have heterochromia is a fact. Not some speculation, not a "maybe" or "might not". If you have eyes you can see that she literally went for a dangerous proceedure to get one of her eyes blue. It's a shame that she felt the need to fake something she doesn't have. Photos upon mountains of evidence shows she had that proceedure done, not only that, her influences is making impressionable youth to get the same procedure. She needs to be cancelled along with that company. MessyTea (talk) 20:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2016
It's been proven that Sarah McDaniel in fact DOES NOT have heterochromia iridium but just uses contacts, I'd add the the pictures in this but it says that in order for me to do so I have to have taken them with my own camera. I'd kindly appreciate it if you took the heterochromia part out of her "bio" (in a manner of speaking) ManaSikk (talk) 09:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC) ManaSikk (talk) 09:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Got any references from WP:Reliable sources to WP:Verify that claim? Wikishovel (talk) 09:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 09:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2016
It's been proven that Sarah McDaniel in fact DOES NOT have heterochromia iridium but just uses contacts. I'd kindly appreciate it if you took the heterochromia iridium part out and replaced it with "she's mostly known for her eyes which give off the appearance of heterochromia iridium but are instead just contacts" ManaSikk (talk) 09:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC) ManaSikk (talk) 09:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Got any references from WP:Reliable sources to WP:Verify that claim? Wikishovel (talk) 09:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 09:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

"Heterochromia"
Are images that clearly show a contact lens in her eye not enough proof that she is not indeed heterochromatic? Just because Forbes says she is heterochromatic, doesn't mean she is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editguy (like Doomguy, but lame) (talk • contribs) 01:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * See WP:Reliable sources. No, images from social media and gossip blogs aren't "proof" of anything. Wikishovel (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Childhood photos
There are some childhood photos of McDaniel viewable at a Dignity Memorial page for her late maternal grandfather - select "VIEW PHOTO GALLERY" and view the 30th image, from 2 April 2006 — McDaniel was then 10 years old. It is merely one example of childhood photos in which McDaniel's eyes are visibly brown. Would this constitute a reliable source? Deltahinds (talk) 02:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Still no. Not our call to make that distinction. We are to report what is noted in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 02:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Heterochromia
Her dad confirmed that he released a photo of her with brown eyes and that people ”claim” that she wears a blue contact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlliciaM (talk • contribs) 15:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * IMDB is not a reliable source. I have no objection to this being added, but only if there's a reliable source to back it up. TJRC (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

there are sources
Hello, I tried to make changes to her page but they were deleted. User Greyjoy replied that an edit as controversial as the one I am making needs to be discussed on this page to have a consensus. If I was a bit harsh with my reply to Greyjoy I apologize, but when I read the falsehoods I get nervous. This is what I wrote:

Controversies
Sarah is always seen wearing cosmetic contact lenses to artificially imitate the look of having heterochromia. Despite her insistance on the contrary, she was naturally born with both brown eyes; her biological father Gregory Paul McDaniel, who also accused her of homophobia because of his bisexuality, has posted photos of her with her real brown eyes.

(end)

This modeling agency she worked for says that she has hazel eyes: http://archive.is/TbCti

According to all this, it can not be denied that she has dark hazel/brown eyes. If she doesn't use colored contact lenses, she would remain a girl like there are so many, very exhibitionist anyway. Plus, she doesn't have such a remarkable career. If it were not for these colored contact lenses, nobody would know who she is, please...


 * As explained in reply to your edits, these are not reliable sources as required by Wikipedia.  Grey joy talk 05:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Are any of these reliable sources?
https://www.elle.com/beauty/a26559657/sarah-mcdaniel-celebface-interview-2019/ https://www.noavee.co.uk/2018/10/29/does-faking-an-eye-condition-challenge-the-beauty-standards-debate/
 * Well the Elle article is already cited and used in the Heterochromia section of the article. The Noavee article may be useable but doesn't add anything new.  Grey joy talk 05:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2019
Sarah McDaniel's own father eventually took to Instagram to post images of McDaniel as a child, clearly showing her eyes as being the same brown color. While working with her former agency L.A. Models, McDaniel was the subject of many high quality photoshoots. In many of these shoots, it was evident that she was wearing a colored contact lens, including in her video shoot with the Chainsmokers for "Closer" ft. Halsey. McDaniel was let go from her agency as a result of her use of contact lenses to misrepresent herself. 2001:18E8:2:28B7:4DE1:F9A:A22F:6E26 (talk) 20:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Roadguy2 (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2019
UNDER 'HETEROCHRIMIA' SECTION: On April 8th, 2017, Sarah's father Gregory Paul McDaniel confirmed that she was not born with heterochromia via an Instagram post featuring a childhood picture of Sarah with her regular brown eyes. DellaBellaSella (talk) 17:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Þjarkur (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2019
I see that Wikipedia is ignoring all users who point towards the FACT that Sarah McDaniels heterochromia is fake. Where is the logic in including a StyleCaster article as a "legitimate enough" source, but not HER OWN FATHER'S (Gregory Paul McDaniels) post that it is fake? Where is the justice in this? Her lies are demeaning ACTUAL bully victims, and she is robbing other models who really do have the condition of their chance to shine. What is the logic in refusing to allow reasonable users to include these facts? I had no idea Wikipedia was so biased. 98.188.112.49 (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Þjarkur (talk) 21:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)