Talk:Sarah Stock/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Intro
Hello. My name is weebiloobil, I will be your reviewer for the forseeable future. Due to the lengthy wait before this review, I shall attempt to complete this review as quick as possible, although of course I will never sacrifice quality. Due to the fact that I will be revewing Dark Angel (wrestler) and Juggernaut (wrestler) at the same time, comments about one of the articles can be left on the review page for the other, if you so desire, to save time flitting between the articles. Whilst reviewing articles is a speciality of mine, wrestling is not, and so I may appreciate some help with terms, and the like. Good luck!
 * Note: It has been five days since the above was posted and the reviewer hasn't edited on Wikipedia since then, so I am removing the "under review" tag at WP:GAN in the hope of finding a reviewer. GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Take two

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The article seems to suggest that Stock only wrestled under the name "Dark Angel" for a brief time, though the citations suggest it has been in use longer. Given the article is titled "Dark Angel", this seems incongruous to me. It is hard to get a handle on the time frame of Stock's time spent in various promotions (debut).  The entire section seems to encompass only about a year and a half, but with only two date mentions, I kinda get lost.  Can this be addressed?  There also does not appear to be much after 2006.  Is there more information available on what Stock has been up to in the past two years?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images would be nice, but not necessary for GA
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Decent article overall, especially compared to what it was when AfDed. I'd say a few minor clarifications and this is a GA.  Resolute 00:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Images would be nice, but not necessary for GA
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Decent article overall, especially compared to what it was when AfDed. I'd say a few minor clarifications and this is a GA.  Resolute 00:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. In response to your comments: (1) I agree that the statement about Stock returning to her real name is proven false by the sources. I removed the sentence. As for the article name, your comment made me realize that the article should probably be moved. She competes under multiple ring names, including her real name in Shimmer. I don't know if moving the article midway through a GA review is wise, though. (2) I added dates to the "Debut" section. I agree that following the career of an independent wrestler can be confusing, as some (like stock) wrestle for several promotions in quick succession just to get some ring time. (3) It's hard to find information from good sources. Wrestling rumor sites talk about her, but they're not particularly reliable. I expanded the discussion of Stock's career with Shimmer, though.

Please look these changes over when you have a chance and let me know what you think. Thanks again, GaryColemanFan (talk) 01:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You have addressed my concerns. I'm now ready to list this as a GA, but I will let you move the article first.  As such, I'll do all of the "paperwork" in adding it to the GA page, etc a bit later after the article is moved.  Regards, Resolute 02:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The article is now at Sarah Stock. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)