Talk:Sarama/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: AGK  [&bull; ] 14:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of January 28, 2011, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Prose is poor; cf Talk:Sarama/GA1
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Pass
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
 * 5. Article stability? Pass
 * 6. Images?: Pass

I don't think much has improved since the last GA.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. AGK [&bull; ] 14:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)