Talk:Sarracenia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Delldot (talk · contribs) 03:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I will be happy to do this review. delldot  &nabla;.  03:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sarr Cat, nice work so far, beautiful article with a very interesting subject! A few suggestions to get you started: I think this will be a fair amount of time, so ping me when you get through referencing and implementing these and I'll have more suggestions. A good start! delldot  &nabla;.  03:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I would move "is a genus of carnivorous plants" to the first sentence.
 * There's a "dated" tag: "Flora of North America to be published in 2008". Can this be updated?
 * I think the lead should be exanded to include some mention of cultivation, classification, and some of the other sections. It should be a summary of the artiicle.
 * It's best to write in simple language and minimize jargon and specialized language (e.g. "morphophysiological characteristics"). Where unfamiliar terms can't be replaced they should be explained.
 * Lots more referencing needed. At the least, every paragraph after the lead should have one ref. (If one ref covers more than that, cite it repeatedly).
 * Ok, it's been a couple weeks, no word from the nom. I'll fail this for now and perhaps it can be nominated again later if there's someone willing to keep working on it.  delldot   &nabla;.  03:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I got caught up with other stuff, I had planned to do more work on it, but was unable to find the time... Sarr Cat ∑;3 06:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh well, no harm done, there's always later. delldot   &nabla;.  07:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)