Talk:Saskatchewan Highway 58

Peer review
It was stated that a simultaneous peer review could be requested. Trying to get quality Canadian/Saskatchewan articles online regarding highways. Any help appreciated.SriMesh | talk  18:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Good article review

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This has about the same problems as Saskatchewan Highway 16 does, including one more. Along with the red links and the wrong junction table, this article has not one picture and a messed up shield. I have put this article as well on hold for the time being. After all are fixed, this can pass for GA. Mitch 32contribs 17:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, I have to fail this article. It does not meet the requirements that were raised. Sorry. Mitch 32contribs 01:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)