Talk:Satan's Harvest Home

Towards B-class
As I look at those six rules of B... Looks like a B-class (at least) to me. Nicely done. Probably even a good article, but I won't assess that far; sorry! --an odd name 14:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Y Very well-cited. Make sure that cite templates give the used pages (for books) and don't produce redundant punctuation, that your paraphrasing means what the source says, and that other users' edits don't stray from the sources.
 * 2) [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Y I'm not sure there's much else to add.
 * 3) [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Y Well-structured—covers the work first (in great detail), then gives reactions to the work, then publish history. "Contemporary reception" is short, so consider expanding or merging it with the next subsection.
 * 4) [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Y As I say below, the article's very easy to read.
 * 5) [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Y Nice contemporary paintings. If you can get an image of the work itself, there should be no issues there at all.
 * 6) [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Y I see no problems with accessibility. The article structure is simple and I found it very easy to read; if you wish, you can try reading the article again, and seeing if any words or phrases need explanation or links to Wiktionary.
 * Many thanks for this, AnOddName. I'm glad you think it might be approaching GA nom condition. I will see if I can try to get a picture, and I agree that "contemporary reception" needs expansion or collapsing into the next section. Thanks very much for the time you devoted to this. Gonzonoir (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Visit to the Quack Doctor
Could we have a citation that this is a gentleman and prostitute? I note that this information is in all the articles related to this image, but I don't see a reference anywhere. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)